Clinical behavior intelligence
See exactly how your content changes clinical decisions.
Competence-level outcomes, Moore's Level 4, measured before and after feedback on real clinical decisions.
Not a report. A snapshot of how clinical decisions turn into action.
Sample program: live NSCLC immunotherapy, checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP)
Measurable impact
What changed after personalized feedback
+33%
Diagnostic accuracy
Correct differential diagnosis
+35%
Guideline adherence
Steroid dosing per CIP grade
+29%
Treatment modification
ICI held appropriately for irAE
-21%
Delayed intervention
Continued ICI despite irAE suspicion
Decision change
Safety-driven management, before vs after
Every clinical action is captured, so you can see the shift in what HCPs actually do once guided feedback closes the gap.
Correct actions, before and after feedback
% of learners taking the guideline-correct action
- Before feedback
- After feedback
Correct diagnosis reached
Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis identified as the differential
Before24% After57% +33% correct diagnosis
Misattribution to infectious pneumonia fell from 38% to 19% as learners understood the importance of ruling out infection before defaulting to antibiotics. Learners recognized the classic triad: ICI therapy, negative infectious workup, and bilateral ground-glass opacities.
Case studies
Three programs, three different problems
Each case study follows the same shape: the gap the client needed to close, what Edocate built, and what measurably changed.
Oncology · immunotherapy
Recognizing and managing an immune-related adverse event
- The gap
- Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis was being missed or mistaken for infection, delaying steroids and continuing oncologic therapy inappropriately.
- What we built
- A multi-visit virtual patient case where the adverse event emerges across follow-up, with guided in-case feedback at the decision points.
- What changed
- Correct steroid initiation and appropriate treatment hold both improved substantially after a single guided hint.
43→73%Correct steroid initiation
Cardiometabolic · hyperlipidemia
Getting patients to a guideline LDL-C target
- The gap
- Treatment intensification was happening too slowly for patients who were not reaching target.
- What we built
- A longitudinal case tracking LDL-C across six months, where each learner's own decisions shaped the patient's trajectory.
- What changed
- Three quarters of participants reached the case target of 70mg/dL or below.
75%Reached the case target
To supply
Add your third program
- The gap
- To supply: The practice gap this program set out to close, in one or two sentences.
- What we built
- To supply: Case format, delivery channel and audience size.
- What changed
- To supply: The headline measured result, with the metric named.
00%Headline result to supply
In their words
What partners say about the data
Edocate turns traditional sessions into interactive and memorable events. These successful events provide us with insightful data that enables us to better understand what practice gaps exist within the physician groups we work with.
Turn your content into outcomes like these.
Book a demo and we'll walk you through a live clinical behavior dashboard.
Book a Demo Explore Edocate Analytics